CCRM: methods and evidence status ↗

02.01 / Scientific foundations

Individual analysis

Individual analysis is the first step in CCRM: available person-specific findings are checked for relevance, quality and timing, then organized into a structured profile.

From principle to practice

01

Represent the biological context

The workflow starts by reviewing available individual clinical, molecular, laboratory, medication and time-related data. Only relevant available findings enter the profile; no fixed test panel is implied. Their source, collection time, units and uncertainty are retained. A blood measurement is not a direct measurement of a tumor or of every cell.

02

Harmonize without erasing information

Map equivalent concepts to shared identifiers, convert compatible units and preserve original values. Record assay methods, reference ranges and tissue origin. Batch effects and differences between laboratories can imitate biological differences; harmonization must be checked rather than assumed. [1]

03

Treat missingness explicitly

An unavailable result must remain unknown, not become zero or a normal value. Imputation, when justified, requires documented assumptions and sensitivity checks. For predictive studies, preprocessing must be learned on training data only to avoid information leakage into evaluation. [3]

04

Respect time and treatment context

Align observations to treatment cycles and sampling times. Medication and supplement exposure, liver and kidney function, and changes over time may alter interpretation. Supplements can interact with cancer drugs through metabolism or transport; any real application requires clinical review. [2]

Explore the mechanism

Educational example · no patient data

Toggle metadata fields for a fictional measurement. A missing unit or time cannot be repaired by a larger amount of unrelated data.

3 / 4 Metadata fields present

Interpretation boundary

The demonstration shows metadata completeness only. It does not measure health, cancer risk or suitability for a compound.

Scientific references

  1. Wilkinson et al. · FAIR Guiding Principles · Scientific Data (2016) ↗
  2. National Cancer Institute · Cancer therapy interactions with foods and dietary supplements (PDQ) ↗
  3. Collins et al. · TRIPOD+AI · BMJ (2024), 385:e078378 ↗

References support the methods described, not the validation or performance of Curetanics. Source titles are shown in their original language.

← Back to homepage · Technology